Skip to main content

Old Dependencies Problem with JHipster

I've started working on a local project with JHipster, and as I generated the project, I noticed that the log output gave me many warnings like this:

WARN deprecated swagger-ui@2.2.10: No longer maintained, please upgrade to swagger-ui@3

Swagger itself is just another tool that lets us more easily access and describe REST APIs while testing, and it is not really meant for production use.  No big deal in and of itself.  The bigger deal is that it seems like even though I am using the latest version of JHipster, the dependencies being consumed by that version themselves are already going out of date.  I haven't dug into the documentation on JHipster yet to see whether there are issues or concerns about manually updating these dependencies myself -- examples might include dependency version requirements, dependency conflicts, etc.  Still, I pause a bit with this as a production tool because unlike a standard library, JHipster is more of a generator and bootstrapper/dependency-manager itself, and I would hope that it would keep track of dependencies it generates for me.  Perhaps given the massive number of tools and potential dependencies out there, this is asking too much.

In related news, I also notice after designing my data model in JDL (super fun!), when I try to import my new project into intelliJ and let it generate the project layout from the gradle build file, gradle fails with the following message:

assert System.properties['java.specification.version'] == '1.8'
              |         |                                                                  |
              |         10                                                              false

Unfortunately, this means I am bound to java 8 with this tool in some fashion (maybe just for gradle and not my actual application?), and I may not be able to use reactive streams and other cool features that show up in later JDK releases.

I am going to press forward with the tool for now to explore what it can do, and I'll see about updating dependencies and allowed JDK versions later.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spring Security - Authority vs Role

I have spent a lot of time recently trying to understand the difference between Authority and Role in Spring Security.  This is a brief review of what I found. When creating a UserDetailsService or overriding configure(AuthenticationManagerBuilder auth) in the security config class that extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter, I basically get complete control over what I populate inside of the UserDetails that is used/returned.  This is important because the UserDetails interface really only cares about how to return one thing: Collection<? extends GrantedAuthority> getAuthorities(); A GrantedAuthority just seems like a glorified String wrapper that names some thing.  The question is... what is that thing? This is where the subtle difference between Authority and Role comes into play. I think that Role is an older thought/construct that automatically gets plugged into Authority if we just create a user with a Role.  But completely forget about the code a...

SQL, Booleans, JPA, and Hibernate

For a long time, SQL and Booleans have not gotten along.  Standards for SQL never really addressed the need for boolean data -- it was assumed that some other data type could easily just step in and address this need.  The result was a lot of different data models for boolean values.  Here are some examples. TRUE or FALSE T or F Y or N 1 or 0 <any value> vs NULL The internet shows the debate has gone on , even as SQL standards have changed .  Coming from a professional background with Oracle, I struggled with this across my teams because everyone had a different opinion, which led to a lot of time wasted due to debate. This said, I appreciate working with native queries in hibernate's JPA implementation against MySQL.  MySQL supports a BIT data type I recently discussed .  When we represent data in MySQL with BIT and restrict the length to just 1 (ie 1 bit), Hibernate JPA magically knows to query and return this data as a Boolean in the ...

ANSI-92 SQL Syntax - aka "JOIN" me in software progress!

 I've run into several projects lately that don't use and/or refuse to use the JOIN keyword/syntax.  I've had conversations in these projects to help people understand that, but I wonder why this is not more common across SQL database projects.  This standard is not new, and it more easily defines the join section vs the WHERE/filter section, so it has good benefits.  So far, the only reason I have heard to not use it is "we just don't tend to do that here."  This makes me sad. I hope to continue evangelizing small changes like this in my projects, be it JOIN, use of functional programming, listening to IDE feedback (great static analysis checking... available before you ever even push!), etc.  There are so many small things that help make software easier for everyone, I think.